Finally America…

Finally Americans are seeing what Obama really desires and wishes for America. he intends to destroy the country we love and have spilled many quarts of blood to protect. He wishes to destroy the Constitution, make America a third world country and to set himself up as dictator. He is at the moment conjuring up one of the worst, dirtiest campaigns in America’s history. What is so hard to believe is all the many goat heads who believe in this man thinking he has their interest at heart. Hillary, Reid, Pelosi are nothing but Tumble Bug Material. Ask Oprah and many others what she now thinks of Obama. He is a user, destroyer, liar and one of the biggest frauds this world has ever seen. DON’T BE A FOOL AND VOTE FOR THIS MAN EVER AGAIN.

Aside | Posted on by | Leave a comment

Chi Trib Columnist: Hillary Should Replace Obama

Monday, 19 Sep 2011 11:34 AM

By Martin Gould
More ways to share…

President Barack Obama’s got a decidedly downbeat message from his hometown newspaper on Monday – please don’t run for re-election.

The message did not come directly from the Chicago Tribune, but from a distinguished member of its editorial board, veteran columnist Steve Chapman.

Even so, the fact it was printed in the Windy City’s most prominent newspaper – which endorsed Obama in 2008 – is a major blow to the president.

“Someone said that when a man is smitten with a beautiful woman, he should remember that somebody somewhere is tired of her. Likewise, the most inspiring presidents get stale after years of constant overexposure,” wrote Chapman, who said that Democrats have a more-than-able replacement candidate in Hillary Clinton.

“Her husband presided over a boom, she’s been busy deposing dictators instead of destroying jobs, and she’s never been accused of being a pushover.

“Not only that, Clinton is a savvy political veteran who already knows how to run for president. Oh, and a new Bloomberg poll finds her to be merely ‘the most popular national political figure in America today.’ “

Clinton has said repeatedly that she has no intention of standing for the presidency, saying she is done with elective politics.

Reaction to the piece was swift. Writing on Hot Air, Ed Morrissey said, “I’ve said repeatedly that I think a withdrawal by Obama is a low-probability event at best, and I still believe it to be a long shot. However, when the home-town papers are starting to make the call for retirement, it’s maybe not quite as much of a long shot as before.”

Chapman’s column, entitled “Why Obama Should Withdraw,” started by pointing out that when Ronald Reagan ran for re-election in 1984, his slogan was “Morning in America.” Obama’s slogan in 2012 should be “Midnight in a Coal Mine,” Chapman suggested.

“The sputtering economy is about to stall out, unemployment is high, his jobs program may not pass, foreclosures are rampant and the poor guy can’t even sneak a cigarette.

“His approval rating is at its lowest level ever,” added Chapman, who has sat on the Tribune’s editorial board for 30 years. “His party just lost two House elections — one in a district it had held for 88 consecutive years. He’s staked his future on the jobs bill, which most Americans don’t think would work.”

The Harvard-educated columnist pointed out that there is nothing in the Constitution that forces a president to run for a second term. Obama, he said, “can scrap the campaign, bag the fundraising calls and never watch another Republican debate as long as he’s willing to vacate the premises by Jan. 20, 2013.

“That might be the sensible thing to do,” he added. “Why not leave of his own volition instead of waiting to get the ax?”

Chapman said that too often a president’s second term is difficult anyway.

“Richard Nixon was forced to resign in disgrace, Reagan had the Iran-Contra scandal, and Bill Clinton made the unfortunate acquaintance of Monica Lewinsky.

“Administration officials get weary after four years and leave in droves. The junior varsity has to be put into service. New ideas are hard to come by.”

And with the likelihood of the GOP holding both Houses of Congress, a second-term could be a nightmare for Obama. “Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner will bound out of bed each day eager to make his life miserable.

“If he runs for re-election, Obama may find that the only fate worse than losing is winning. But he might arrange things so it will be (Hillary) Clinton who has the unenviable job of reviving the economy, balancing the budget, getting out of Afghanistan and grappling with House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.

“Obama, meanwhile, will be on a Hawaiian beach, wrestling the cap off a Corona.”

Read more on Chi Trib Columnist: Hillary Should Replace Obama
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama’s Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Government & Politics

Government & Politics.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Government & Politics

Obama’s Speech Job
In case you were busy washing your hair, rewinding your CDs or getting a root canal last night, Barack Obama gave a speech. Yes, another one, and with warmed-over recycled ideas, to boot. He made sure we all knew his speech was about jobs because he used the word “jobs” 44 times. (Given his narcissism, we wonder if that number was intentional.) Indeed, he centered the speech on his “American Jobs Act,” which, by the way, aims to create jobs. He hasn’t yet sent an actual bill to Congress, though he called for Congress to “pass this bill right away” (or some variant) 17 times, but … jobs.

In the spirit of bipartisan comity, we’ll start by lauding something with which we agreed: “Those of us here tonight can’t solve all of our nation’s woes,” the president said. “Ultimately, our recovery will be driven not by Washington, but by our businesses and our workers.” We couldn’t have said it better. Government doesn’t create jobs; it can only create conditions under which the economy can flourish. Unfortunately, it was downhill from there, because Obama’s very next sentence began, “But…”

Obama repeatedly framed his proposals as “nothing controversial” because “everything in here” has already been proposed by “both Democrats and Republicans.” We hate to disagree, but nearly everything in the speech was controversial. From tax hikes on job creators in exchange for gimmicky tax credits, to more money dumped into the bottomless pit of education and infrastructure, to the very premise that government must grow in order for the economy to grow — the ideas presented last night were the wrong ones.

Taxes were a major theme, but instead of proposing permanently lower rates and a broader base — something that would actually work — the president called for more temporary complications and supposed sweeteners. Obama said that Congress must extend the temporary payroll tax cut they passed last year, because, he warned, “If we allow that tax cut to expire — if we refuse to act — middle-class families will get hit with a tax increase at the worst possible time.” That’s interesting: A tax cut expiration is a tax increase. Funny how that didn’t apply to the Bush tax cuts, which were good for 10 years, not just one. And funny how it doesn’t apply to increasing the taxes of job creators “at the worst possible time.” Indeed, that was his next proposal.

“[T]here are many Republicans who don’t believe we should raise taxes on those who are most fortunate and can best afford it,” he said, but, “We need a tax code where everyone gets a fair shake, and everybody pays their fair share. And I believe the vast majority of wealthy Americans and CEOs are willing to do just that, if it helps the economy grow and gets our fiscal house in order.” Of course, “everybody” means the top 2 percent. He then declared with a straight face, “This isn’t class warfare.” Republicans in the chamber gave him the only appropriate response: laughter.

Estimates are that this stimulus package as proposed would cost about $447 billion. That’s about half of the first stimulus, and we saw how well that worked. (Little wonder that Democrats have stricken the word “stimulus” from the lexicon.) How on earth will another few hundred billion dollars suddenly fix anything? “Everything in this bill will be paid for. Everything,” Obama insisted, but how?

First of all, through the aforementioned tax increases on a select and punishable few. Primarily, however, Obama wants the debt reduction committee, created in the debt ceiling deal to find $1.5 trillion in savings over 10 years, to come up with even more savings, again over 10 years. In other words, let’s spend another $450 billion now and have future presidents and Congresses pay for it later. Also, “a week from Monday,” Obama will release “a more ambitious deficit plan.” If this all wasn’t so preposterous, it would’ve been another laugh line.

Obama also mocked those who think that government is too big. He trotted out his predictable straw-man arguments about Republicans wanting to cut “most government spending” or eliminating “most government regulations.” He certainly intends to fight hard for the new floor of government spending and regulation he has established. He may offer a concession here or there, but by and large the damage has already been done. Even rolling back to the bloated and costly — but still far smaller and cheaper — government of 2008 will be impossible while he occupies the White House. Finally, there’s a big difference between limited government and no government. It is the former that we must seek.

Just how half-baked was this speech?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Real Truth About Sarah Palin

The Real Truth About Sarah Palin.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Real Truth About Sarah Palin

The Real Truth About Sarah Palin.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Real Truth About Sarah Palin

Ouch! Very interesting facts on two very different ladies.

Sarah Palin

Whether you’re a Democrat,
Independent, or Republican….the second half of this email should
make all of us very sick, send this on … Especially the second


By Dewie Whetsell, Alaskan
As posted in comments on Greta’s article
referencing the MOVEON ad about Sarah

The last 45 of my 66 years
I’ve spent in a commercial fishing town in Alaska . I understand
Alaska politics but never understood national politics well until
this last year. Here’s the breaking point: Neither side of the
Palin controversy gets it. It’s not about persona, style,
rhetoric, it’s about doing things. Even Palin supporters never
mention the things that I’m about to mention

1. Democrats forget when
Palin was the Darling of the Democrats, because as soon as Palin
took the Governor’s office away from a fellow Republican and tough
SOB, Frank Murkowski, she tore into the Republican’s “Corrupt
Bastards Club” (CBC) and sent them packing. Many of them are now
residing in State housing and wearing orange jump suits The
Democrats reacted by skipping around the yard, throwing confetti
and singing, “la la la la” (well, you know how they are). Name
another governor in this country that has ever done anything

2. Now with the CBC gone,
there were fewer Alaskan politicians to protect the huge, giant
oil companies here. So she constructed and enacted a new system of
splitting the oil profits called “ACES.” Exxon (the biggest
corporation in the world) protested and Sarah told them, “don’t
let the door hit you in the stern on your way out.” They stayed,
and Alaska residents went from being merely wealthy to being
filthy rich. Of course, the other huge international oil companies
meekly fell in line. Again, give me the name of any other governor
in the country that has done anything

3. The other thing she did
when she walked into the governor’s office is she got the list of
State requests for federal funding for projects, known as “pork.”
She went through the list, took 85% of them and placed them in the
“when-hell-freezes-over” stack. She let locals know that if we
need something built, we’ll pay for it ourselves. Maybe she
figured she could use the money she got from selling the previous
governor’s jet because it was extravagant. Maybe she could use the
money she saved by dismissing the governor’s cook (remarking that
she could cook for her own family), giving back the State vehicle
issued to her, maintaining that she already had a car, and
dismissing her State-provided security force (never mentioning – I
imagine – that she’s packing heat herself). I’m still waiting to
hear the names of those other

4. Now, even with her
much-ridiculed “gosh and golly” mannerism, she also managed to put
together a totally new approach to getting a natural gas pipeline
built which will be the biggest private construction project in
the history of North America. No one else could do it although
they tried. If that doesn’t impress you, then you’re trying too
hard to be unimpressed while watching her do things like this
while baking up a batch of brownies with her other

5. For 30 years, Exxon
held a lease to do exploratory drilling at a place called Point
Thompson. They made excuses the entire time why they couldn’t
start drilling. In truth they were holding it like an investment.
No governor for 30 years could make them get started. Then, she
told them she was revoking their lease and kicking them out. They
protested and threatened court action. She shrugged and reminded
them that she knew the way to the court house. Alaska won

6. President Obama wants
the nation to be on 25% renewable resources for electricity by
2025. Sarah went to the legislature and submitted her plan for
Alaska to be at 50% renewable by 2025. We are already at 25%. I
can give you more specifics about things done, as opposed to style
and persona. Everybody wants to be cool, sound cool, look cool.
But that’s just a cover-up. I’m still waiting to hear from
liberals the names of other governors who can match what mine has
done in two and a half years. I won’t be holding my

By the way, she was content to return to Alaska
after the national election and go to work, but the haters
wouldn’t let her. Now these adolescent screechers are obviously
not scuba divers. And no one ever told them what happens when you
continually jab and pester a barracuda. Without warning, it will
spin around and tear your face off. Shoulda known

You have just read the
truth about Sarah Palin that sends the media, along with the
Democrat party, into a wild uncontrolled frenzy to discredit her.
I guess they are only interested in skirt chasers, dishonesty,
immoral people, liars, womanizers, murderers, and bitter
ex-presidents’ wives.

So “You go, Girl.” I only wish the
men in Washington had your guts, determination, honesty, and
morals. I rest my case. Only FOOLS listen to the biased

If you’ve read this far
… now, open your eyes to this….

First Lady Michelle
Obama’s Servant List and Pay Scale

The First Lady Requires
More Than Twenty Attendants (that’s 22 attendants to be

1. $172,200 – Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)

2. $140,000 – Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy
Assistant to the President and Director of Policy And Projects For
The First Lady)

3. $113,000 – Rogers, Desiree G. (Special
Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary)

4. $102,000 – Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the
President and Director of Communications for the First Lady)

5.. $100,000 – Winter, Melissa E. (Special Assistant to the
President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)

6. $90,000 – Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First

7. $84,000 – Lelyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press
Secretary to the First Lady)
8. $75,000 – Starkey, Frances M.
(Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)

9. $70,000 – Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects
for the First Lady)

10. $65,000 – Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy
Director and Deputy Social Secretary)

11. $64,000 – Reinstein,
Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)

12. $62,000 – Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and
Events Coordinator For The First Lady)

13. $60,000 – Fitts,
Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the
First Lady)

14. $57,500 – Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant
and Personal Aide to the First Lady)

15. $52,500 – Mustaphi,
Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary to The
First Lady)

16. $50,000 – Jarvis, Kristen E..
(Special-2Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide to The First

17. $45,000 – Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director
of Correspondence For The First Lady)

18. $43,000 – Tubman,
Samantha (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)

19. $40,000 – Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of
Staff to the First Lady)

20. $36,000 – Armbruster, Sally M.
(Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)

21. $35,000 –
Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)
22. $35,000 – Jackson, Deilia
A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First
Lady) (This is community organizing at it’s

There has NEVER been
anyone in the White House at any time who has created such an army
of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First
Lady’s social life.One wonders why she needs so much help, at
taxpayer expense, when even Hillary, only had three; Jackie
Kennedy one; Laura Bush one; and prior to Mamie Eisenhower social
help came from the President’s own pocket.

Note: This does not
include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and “First
Hairstylist” Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom traveled aboard Air
Force One to Europe.





Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment